Eat, eat, eat! If that's all you do, that's all you deserve: one mouthful after another. But if you pay attention, you start to taste shadings of difference: good, better, best. Herewith, Cornichon's personal roster of the tastiest Belltown served up in 2007.
Kevin Davis at Steelhead Diner, Chicken Tikka at Marjorie, Lamb with hummus at Black Bottle.
Belltown Restaurant of the Year: Steelhead Diner, not even a year old and clearly atop the dining scene. Hands down the best oysters of the season, "caviar pie" that's already a legend, jumbo crabcakes that taste like the ocean, a commitment to local and organic ingredients, a serious wine list that sticks to approachable Pacific Northwest bottles. From his post in the corner of the kitchen, Kevin Davis oversees a dining room that's half local, half tourist, all happy. Bravo!
Belltown Newcomer of the Year: A big welcome to Txori, the tiny Basque pintxos bar which gets me in, gives me a drink and a bite, and sends me on my way for under ten bucks and under half an hour. You can get a short glass of Stella for two bucks! It's called a zurito. And a gilda--anchovy, olive and peppers on a crunchy slice of Le Panier bread--for $3.50. Haven't had this much fun standing at a counter since, well, tapas-hopping in Spain. Runners-up: Tavolata, Entre Nous and Local Vine.
Most imaginative Belltown promotion: Campagne's ratatouille cooking classes for kids.
Best Belltown Bar: the charming, cozy alcove at the entrance to Marjorie, where owner Donna Moodie often holds court while barman Ben Sherwood mixes exceptionally generous drinks and the kitchen turns out delectable plates like chicken tikka. At happy hour, try the pulled pork sandwiches with a Red Stripe.
Best Belltown Bites: Black Bottle's lamb with hummus, Tavolata's gnocchi with a ragu beef tongue, 94 Stewart's braised lamb shank, Local Vine's wagyu beef, Txori's Gulas Pil-Pil, Le Pichet's beet salad with sweetbreads.
So long, 2007! Here's to many happy meals in 2008!

Published a pretty straightforward critique of the new Zagat guide a couple of days ago, crossposted on Seattlest.com. Cornichon readers approved, but somebody reading Seattlest felt offended. Read on for the complete comment string. (The good stuff comes toward the end.) Too touchy? Moi?
In response, have started a new blog titled The Short List: Seattle. What Cornichon likes, period.
Meanwhile, here are the comments from Ziggedy Zaggedy Zagat on Seattlest.com
Comments (9)
Avatar Wesa
By Wesa
[1] | 12/22/07 02:28PM
I received a copy for free for submitting a few reviews. It gives us a quick guide to checking out new places that we haven't heard of. I think if you can get it for free, it's worth having around.
Avatar Wesa
By Wesa
[2] | 12/22/07 02:28PM
I received a copy for free for submitting a few reviews. It gives us a quick guide to checking out new places that we haven't heard of. I think if you can get it for free, it's worth having around.
Avatar
By LarryB
[3] | 12/24/07 01:42PM
For what it's worth, Zagat's isn't a real review book. It really is a printed sort of Yelp guide. I think you're being a little too hard on them.
FWIW, I find the electronic version useful for when I visit unfamiliar places and lack local recommendations.
Avatar
By bigyaz
[4] | 12/26/07 03:50PM
Yeah, you wouldn't want to read anything with comments by the slovenly masses. Rather than the "ignorant boors" you can get your dining news from a "pretentious bore" like Ronald.
Avatar
By ronaldholden
[5] | 12/26/07 05:27PM
Reply to Larry B: that's my point, Zagat's not a review book at all but transcribed shouts & murmurs...just like Yelp. Although there are many "contributors," each individual restaurant has relatively few reader mentions, resulting in "bizarre" quotes and "absurd" attributes.
Replying to BigYaz: does da Seattle Timez Ceiling Cat (whence comes your email) know what you're up to? Surfing the internetz can be hazardous to parochial outlooks. But, yeah, if it comes down to it, I'd rather be called pretentious than be ignorant.
Avatar
By bigyaz
[6] | 12/26/07 05:43PM
Hmm, so anyone who posts a criticism of Seattlest gets their IP address tracked and subtly threatened with exposure if they might be posting from a work account (which, incidentally, I'm not)?
Talk about small-minded. You seem very happy to criticize just about everyone else who writes about food and wine, yet get mighty defensive when it's aimed at you. You may want to try some therapy for that.
Avatar
By ronaldholden
[7] | 12/26/07 06:33PM
One step at a time, BigYaz.
Anyone who posts online these days is certainly savvy enough to know that IP addresses are a matter of public record. You park your car, they take your license number. You don't like it, don't drive.
As for myself, how can I possibly be less defensive about my own very modest competence? The only local food writer I have a problem with, as you surely know by now, is Leslie Kelly, who needs to get a real job somewhere, preferably not where her husband works.
Avatar
By bigyaz
[8] | 12/27/07 11:28AM
I really don't want to continue this back and forth, but trust me, as a network consultant I know all about IP addresses. What I don't understand is why the source of a comment is important to you as a blogger. Do you have some need to ascribe motive to anyone who might criticize your overblown prose? Or to issue vague threats about "outing" them ("Does the Seattle Times know...)? It just seems small-minded and petty, not good traits in someone who likes to put their own opinions out there.
Avatar
By ronaldholden
[9] | 12/27/07 12:05PM
What do you want me to say? That I agree, my unedited prose is occasionally overblown? That my curiosity about those who comment on my posts could be considered inappropriate? That like most mortals I can small-minded and petty? Guilty, guilty, guilty. Welcome to the imperfect world of blogs.
Michael Ruhlman is something of a foodie phenom. A journalist who fell into cooking after writing about education and boatbuilding, he has collaborated on a series of celebrity-chef cookbooks (with Eric Ripert and Thomas Keller), contributes regularly to the New York Times and is often on TV as a panelist or judge for reality-cooking shows. He also has an extensive website, ruhlman.com, that was just named the best industry-related food blog (and best chef blog) on the internetz.
Ruhlman's latest publication is a book called The Elements of Cooking, an obvious echo of Strunk & White's The Elements of Style. After a few uninspired essays (Stock, Salt, Eggs), the book is a quasi-encyclopedia of cooking terms, from Acid to Zester. Each entry is what you'd expect if you asked a humorless, pedantic friend to explain something: "what does al dente mean?" "what's kimchi? and so on. Three categories of soup (clear, cream, puree). Cook, sous-chef and line cook get separate entries. But Half-and-Half? Spatula?
David Kamp, meanwhile, is out with the Food Snob's Dictionary, a hilarious "essential lexicon of gastronomical knowledge." You may remember Vanity Fair writer Kamp as the author of The United States of Arugula, a deliciously gossipy history of the foodie movement that also happened to name almost everyone who had ever slept with James Beard, Craig Claiborne and Alice Waters. Wide circles, though not overlapping.
Many of the two books' entries do overlap, however. But when Ruhlman is finished telling you what a brunoise is (a sauté of diced vegetables), Kamp adds "Maniacal chefs are fond of dismissing unworthy brunoises as 'Sheet!' or 'Merde!' and then demanding that the cowed apprentice chopper start over."
Like the class clown, Kamp doesn't get the teacher's respect; that goes to the super-serious Ruhlman. But they're like the Spratts: between the two of them, they lick the platter clean.
In the miopic eyes of the Euro-Centric VOGs (Viticultural Old Guard), Washington wine remains a bit of a curiosity: exactly two pages in the new World Atlas of Wine while France gets 100. Co-author Jancis Robinson spends enough time in the Pacific Northwest to know better, but she's up against the London-based Mitchell Beazely publishing colossus.
Have no fear: Paul Gregutt to the rescue with a terrific guide devoted exclusively to the products of Washington's vineyards.
Gregutt, my colleague many years ago at Seattle Weekly who currently writes for the Seattle Times and has a lively website of his own, has given us the best gift imaginable: a guide to Washington wines that makes sense of the 500-plus wineries.
Not that Washington Wines & Wineries: The Essential Guide covers every single winery in the state; Gregutt limits himself to the top 100. Most importantly, he also picks the best vineyards, since nothing a winemaker does in the cellar will improve on the raw materials.
In all wine writing, the thing to watch out for is a philosophy that equates winemaking with watchmaking, that wine is something that must needs be "crafted." The "watchmaking" part is the discipline, the intellectual rigor, the sanitation. And, yes, the humility. And humility's what's missing at a lot of wineries. Not just those in Washington, mind you.
Gregutt also gets the history right. He doesn't fall into the oak-lined trap laid by monster wines. He values longevity, solid science and craftsmanship. Yes, he hands out scores, but they're almost irrelevant.
At about the same time Gregutt's book was released, Robert Parker's influential newsletter, The Wine Advocate, came out with a major piece on Washington wines, written not by Parker but by a recently promoted associate, Dr. Jay Miller. Miller knows little about Washington wine and is unfamiliar with the region's history, culture, winemaking traditions, or people. He sprayed high scores with abandon, sometimes making no sense at all (Walla Walla doesn't grow syrah, dude). The industry jumped on the article like thirsty camels, sucking up the praise for “Washington Wine.” and touting Parker scores. But they weren't Parker scores, they were Jay Miller scores. And they were, Gregutt points out, essentially meaningless.
Gregutt's tome doesn't include pictures, though. There's already a fine picture book by photographer Sarah Matthews. Want both? Amazon's got a good package deal.
The new Zagat is out, at least the one "devoted to Seattle" restaurants. And with "all due respect" to "local editor" Alicia Comstock Arter (who also contributes to Northwest Palate), it's "a freakin mess." The trouble, "brewing for years," is that the "capsule reviews" take isolated "nouns and adjectives" from "reader comments" and string them together to make "nonsensical" and "often inaccurate" profiles. It's a Fox News approach to dining, all pseudo-oracular, disjointed headlines with "little substance."
For the record: 759 eateries, contributions from 3,165 self-described frequent diners. Herbfarm leads the list for food and service, as expected, but second place for food goes to a bakery in West Seattle, for God's sake. The Georgian leads for decor. Canlis, Rover's and Mistral also score at the top level. But Uptown Espresso as the city's "best buy"? Seattle's a cheapskate town, as if we didn't already know: average check here is $27.68 while the national average is $33.15. (Why should this be described as a good thing?)
Another problem: the misleading ranking of what Zagat calls the "most popular" restaurants. Zagat's top five: Wild Ginger, Dahlia Lounge, Metropolitan Grill, Canlis and Zoe. Actual retail "most popular" (most customers, highest revenues) are Space Needle, Salty's, Ray's, Daniel's Broiler. Either most Zagat diners don't eat where the rest of us do, or they lie about it.
Not to mention that a book like this is outdated even before it hits the bookstores, never mind the editor's note suspiciously dated Dec. 5, 2007. Supposedly "new" places that aren't new at all (DiVino, Wild Rover, Lark, Umi). Oh, and don't think you can go to Tavolata for a "quiet conversation."
More wildly inaccurate stuff online, where ZigZag Café is said to be "cigar friendly" (WTF?); a reader complains that Salumi 's menu isn't vegetarian-friendly (this could happen only in Seattle!); other readers ding Rover's and Canlis for being stuffy and overpriced (duh). It's the Yelp-ification of dining: acclamation and judgment by noisy, ignorant boors.
If you like this sort of thing, the online version is free with registration. Bottom line for the print version: "a waste of $12.95."
Was asked the other day to name the most under-rated restaurant in Belltown. In the sense of under-appreciated. Gotta be 94 Stewart. While across-the-street neighbor Steelhead Diner gets the buzz, newcomer Txori draws the avant-garde, and Tavolata attracts the trendy, 94 Stewart simply serves excellent food. Last night's cumin-rubbed lamb shank in a pinot noir reduction was just about perfect. And chef Cindy Nelson wasn't afraid to surround the meat with Brussels sprouts, either.
Granted, Lindsey Nelson's no longer on hand to manage the wine list (she's up at Coupage), but the kitchen remains in the good hands of her mom and her brother, Nic, who runs the remarkable cheese selection as well as a blog on the website, 94stewart.com. Hundreds of wines, literally, including great Barolos and Chiantis. Hundreds of favorable comment cards, literally, lining the back hallway. Highly recommended for the holidays, with a special $55 prix fixe menu.
1997: in January, Bill Clinton was sworn in for a second term; in August, Princess Diana was killed in a car crash; and a film about a shipwreck, Titanic, was the top-grossing movie. In the vineyards of the Old World, springtime came early, summer was hot, and the harvest was wet. The wine gurus and the voodoo sages swirled and tasted, ruminated and spat. Bah, they said, don't bother. Bah, said Parker. Bah, said Tanzer. Bah, said the Spectator. Don't bother.
Funny thing, though. The wine doesn't care about the gurus; it doesn't read the Spectator, doesn't subscribe to Parker. Turns out, ten years on, the 1997s are pretty damn good.
Arnie Millan, a wine conusltant with a fine cellar, pulled out a few bottles the other day for a 10-year retrospective tasting at Sorrentino Trattoria on Queen Anne. Two American cabs, a grand cru Burgundy, an Amarone, and half a dozen classified growths from Bordeaux. Wines this old, you don't just pop the cork; you decant carefully, then pour back into the original (cleaned & rinsed) bottle.
Were there disappointments? Sure. La Fleur Pétrus seemed a bit weak, especially compared to Château de Sales, another Pomerol wine with lesser credentials but (in this case, at least) far more impressive staying power. And most of the wines were magnificent. Château Lynch-Bages was at its peak. And the Allegrini Amarone was both subtle and complex, full of young fruit with a port-like finish that made it a terrific match for Sorrentino's tiramisù.
Icebergs be damned. All things come to those who wait, right?
They buzz, they flit, they fly. They dart, they dash, they zip.
Ethan Stowell putt-putts from Union (downtown) to Tavolata (Belltown) to Wolf (Queen Anne). Corino Bonjrada bounces from La Vita e Bella (Belltown) to Mondello (Magnolia). Jim Drohman shuttles between Le Pichet (Belltown/Market) to Café Presse (First Hill/Madison). Scott Staples hops from Zoë (Belltown) to Quinn's (Capitol Hill). Josef Jimenez doesn't ride himself but sends his cooks on a scooter--a Honda, not a Vespa--from Harvest Vine (Madison Valley) to Txori (Belltown).
Hey, parking's tough in Belltown, but there's always room for a scooter.
They are Seattle's wasps, those Vespas. Truly: vespa means wasp in Italian.
That sure didn't last long, did it? Barely nine months.
Wild Salmon, an eatery in Noo Yawk City that supposedly showcased Pacific Northwest cuisine, is calling it quits. Charles Ramseyer, who left Ray's Boathouse to open the joint for his friend Jeffrey Chodorow, will stay in the Big Apple (for the time being) and labor for other properties in the China Grill group. Chodorow went off the deep end after Frank Bruni dumped on Wild Salmon in the NYTimes; he started an anti-Bruni blog, took out full page ads and generally behaved like a douchebag. But still ...
Rough world out there. Dog eat dog, bird eat fish, etc.
Wow, Aunt Minnie from Moline can spend a summer afternoon watching a real Seattle chef! Gray Line of Seattle figures plenty of visitors will want to tag along on a trip through the market and demo in the kitchen. Jason Wilson of Crush is the only "name" to sign up, but the Space Needle, El Gaucho and Palisade are also on the list for the 3-1/2 hour programs.
Don't take this wrong. Local celebrity chefs like Kerry Sear have been doing market tours for years (a bargain at $75, including lunch with wine). Gray Line's just making it possible for outsiders to pretend they're insiders, if only for an afternoon, buy springing for Product 1326.
Says Gray Line's Judy Sprute, "People are looking for personal, interactive experiences during their vacations." She expects the 20 tour dates to sell out quickly because "it's a unique way to experience Seattle."
The $100 tab doesn't include an actual lunch, however. Gray Line says it hopes customers "take the opportunity to return to your tour location for a full meal during your stay."
From the Zebraguy at Highfield Ranch in California.
Miki braised a bunch of random goat cuts overnight from an animal we slaughtered about two weeks ago and put in the freezer. After thawing the meat she browned it as best she could (some of the cuts were awkwardly shaped), then threw them in a big Descoware pot with some
garlic, carrots, salt, pepper, and enough water to keep the mess at a low boil for nearly 20 hrs. When I came home last night the house smelled pungently delicious, and I had me a fine bowl of goat meat pulled off the bone, along with some of the broth and most of the carrots.
I put the pot out overnight to let the fat congeal. This morning I pulled the fat off the top and set it aside as an option to add to the tougher meat if we want to make hamburger. That's the middle lower container in the attached photo. Then I pulled the meat off the bones, separating the fatty and gristly parts into another bowl for the dogs and cats (lower right bowl in photo). Three of the biggest bones are hardy enough for the pooches; the rest went into the trash.
What's still in the pot (left) is the basis of a fine soup.
Your intrepid culinary reporter,
David
Magazine called Cooking Light, which runs "supper clubs" around the country in addition to printing a monthly collection of recipes, picks Seattle as the nation's number one city for healthy eating, just ahead of Portland. Strange, cuz their suppers are sponsored by Benefiber, Tums and Viva paper towels. Their most recent local event was held at that temple of elegance and haute cuisine, The Edgewater.
Aw, c'mon, Cornichon! Don't be such a frigging cynic! Magazine's editorial heart is in the right place (see below the jump), even if the marketing department sometimes seems to be on a different wavelength. Happy to learn that our legions of restaurant cooks are making a living wage. ¿De veras, muchachos? ¿Realmente?
Cooking Light's criteria:
We ranked major metropolitan cities on the following 15 criteria, calculated on a per-capita basis, then grouped into categories--eat smart, be fit, live well--and factored on a four-point scale.Does the city have critically acclaimed food professionals? Source: James Beard-nominated restaurants
How do its restaurants rate? Source: Zagat Survey
Is organic dining a part of the local dining scene? Source: LocalHarvest.org
How many chefs work in the city? Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
Do they earn more than a living wage? Source: BLS
How many farmers' markets does the city have? Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture Farmer's Markets Directory; LocalHarvest.org
Do residents make use of fresh produce? Source: CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Are gourmet ingredients available via national chains? Source: Trader Joe's and Whole Foods locations
Are residents in good health? Source: BRFSS
What are the cities with the lowest rates of diabetes? Source: CDC and BRFSS
What are the cities where residents maintain healthy weights? Source: CDC and BRFSS
How important is exercise to the city's residents? Source: CDC and BRFSS
How much green space does the city provide, and is it well maintained? Source: The Trust for Public Land
Is the city easy to explore on foot? Source: American Podiatric Association